Ultrasound Remission Not Correlated With Clinical Remission in RA

This article originally appeared here.
Share this content:
Ultrasound-detected synovitis has been shown to be predictive of disease flare in patients with RA.
Ultrasound-detected synovitis has been shown to be predictive of disease flare in patients with RA.

No clear association between health status and ultrasound remission was evident in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission, according to a report recently published in Rheumatology.1

Ultrasound-detected synovitis has been shown to be predictive of disease flare in RA.2 “If a better health status is associated with [ultrasound] remission, regular measurement of the self-reported health of RA patients would help to monitor patients at risk of flare,” wrote the researchers.

For the current study, investigators from University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands, evaluated the frequency of ultrasound remission in patients with RA in clinical sustained remission receiving synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). In addition, they compared the health status of patients with RA in clinical sustained remission with that of patients in clinical remission who also met criteria for ultrasound remission.

Ultrasound remission was defined as a power Doppler score of 0, demonstrating the absence of synovial vascularization, and grey scale (GS) grade ≤1, demonstrating minimal-to-absent synovial thickening. The researchers evaluated the 26 joints most frequently involved in RA (metacarpophalangeal joints 2 to 5, proximal interphalangeal joints 2 to 5, wrists, and metatarsophalangeal joints 2 to 5). Health status was determined using patient-reported outcomes instruments for the assessment of general health, functional ability, fatigue, depression and anxiety, pain, and morning stiffness.

Results from the prospective study showed that of the 89 participants, 39% were in ultrasound remission at baseline and 32% at 3 months. Patients in ultrasound remission had lower scores of functional ability, as indicated by their answers on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Although anxiety and depression scores (as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) and pain scores (evaluated with the visual analogue scale [VAS]) were generally low, HADS and VAS scores at 3 months were higher in patients in ultrasound remission than in those not in ultrasound remission (P <.001,  P =.014, respectively). The investigators suggested that these unexpected findings might be due to a reduced sensitivity to pain or to greater coping skills in patients who were not in ultrasound remission.

Summary & Clinical Applicability

“In conclusion, one-third of the RA patients in clinical remission were also in [ultrasound] remission,” wrote the investigators. “In our study population, we could not find a clear association between health status of RA patients and being in [ultrasound] remission. We did find that patients in [ultrasound] remission experienced more pain and anxiety, but this was in the direction opposite to what was expected. This might indicate that health status is not a suitable tool to distinguish patients who do or do not have underlying [ultrasound] synovitis while they are continuing their synthetic and biological DMARDs.”

Limitations & Disclosures

  • The study cohort had a lower flare rate than expected, possibly due to selection bias.
  • The study cohort may have been composed of patients with less-severe disease.

Follow @ClinicalPainAdv

References

  1. van der Ven M, Kuijper TM, Gerards AH, et al. No clear association between ultrasound remission and health status in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission [published online April 11, 2017]. Rheumatology (Oxford). doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex080
  2. Peluso G, Michelutti A, Bosello S, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G. Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long standing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:172-175. doi:10.1136/ard.2010.129924

You must be a registered member of Clinical Pain Advisor to post a comment.